Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1998 (1) TMI 164

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant, engaged in the manufacture of compressors and drilling equipment of various varieties all falling under erstwhile T.I. 68 was clearing the goods on payment of appropriate duty. According to the appellant, certain bought out items such as control panel, hoses were also being supplied to some of the buyers of compressors. Prior to May 1984, whenever such bought out items were sold along with compressors, duty was paid on the assessable value inclusive the value of bought out items. On 1-1-1985 classification list was filed in respect of compressors, without referring to the bought out items. The classification list was finally approved on 20-2-1985. Price list was filed on 1-1-1985 declaring the value of compressors without the addition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... key contract with ITI. On the same day the fourth show cause notice was issued proposing demand of Rs. 15,126/- for the period from 1-7-1985 to 31-12-1985 in respect of hoses supplied along with the excisable items. On 31-3-1986 fifth show cause notice was issued proposing demand of Rs. 9,913/- on the value of hoses for the period from 2-2-1986 to 31-3-1986. 4. On 4-4-1988 the Assistant Collector confirmed duty demand of Rs. 3,70,950/- as proposed in the show cause notices (Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 and not in show cause notice No. 3). On 7-5-1987 Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the order dated 17-3-1985 passed by the Assistant Collector regarding the provisional assessment. 5. On 4-4-1988, the Commissioner who had taken up the third show cau .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... allenged by the appellant. 8. The impugned order refers to various statements recorded from the employees of the appellant and other persons, all indicating that control panels are used to run motors which in turn are used to operate compressors. Compressor is a machine for displacement and compression of gases for the purpose of increasing the pressure of such gases. According to the appellant, compressors can be run using motor or diesel engine and control panel for diesel engine is unnecessary. Control panel is necessary only where electric motor is used, for safe operation of the electric motor. At page 6 of the impugned order the Commissioner himself noted as follows : Without the Control Panel electrical motors cannot be operated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... department opposed this contention. It was pointed out by the department that generating sets are manufactured in the market without these attachments and this assertion was disputed by the assessee. It was held that the Modvat credit will be available to the input which is actually by for being fitted in the generating set cleared by the assessee on payment of duty on the total value of which includes the cost of such inputs also. In other words, on the facts it was seen that the assessee was liable to pay duty on the assessable value of the final product which included the value of the control panel also. In these circumstances, it was held that Modvat credit was available. We do not think that this decision will help us in this case in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e aforesaid proviso. In other words, he did not invoke the larger period of limitation covered by the proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Act. Since the Commissioner issued notice several years after the period in question, it cannot be regarded as being within time. However, his notice indicated that it was in continuation of the first notice issued by the Superintendent. So far as the period within six months prior to the first notice is concerned, the Superintendent was competent to issue the notice and the claim would be within time. The competency of the Commissioner, as a superior authority to call for any adjudication proceedings before the inferior authority and take up the adjudication himself cannot be doubted or disputed. That being .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates