1998 (1) TMI 208

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. The assessee filed classification lists for several products including Pidicryl 3252B. The classification suggested was under sub-heading 3906.90. As per jurisdictional Assistant Collector s letter F. No. V (Ch. 39) 17-CL-181/90/4326, dated 11-6-1991 the final approval of the classification lists was communicated. According to it, pidicryl was not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... emand under the provisions of Section 11A. At that time the Departmental Representative was directed by the Bench to verify the factual position. When this case was called today, Shri A.K. Madan, learned DR submitted that he had addressed a letter to the jurisdictional Commissioner on 5-11-1997 and had also issued a reminder on 1-1-1998. Since he had not received reply, he requests for adjournment .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der sub-heading 3906. Subsequently, the information was given by the jurisdictional Superintendent vide his letter dated 8-3-1991 in which it was stated that contested goods were containing 68% acrylic monomer and 32% styrene monomer. Although test report was enlarged, a copy was not given to the assessee. Before the Adjudicating Authority the assessees justified their classification on the basis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X