1998 (3) TMI 361

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent. [Order per : Lajja Ram, Member (T)]. - The appellants Revenue have come in appeal against the order passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) Jaipur wherein the common Order No. 121-C.E./JPR/88, dated 1-8-1988, he had observed as under : "Though a personal hearing was granted to the appellants on 28-7-1988, no appearance was caused. 2. This is an appeal filed by M/s. Amr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ich date they had furnished an intimation and required declaration to the range officer. The impugned order of the Assistant Collector, accordingly approval to the classification list, needs modification in the light of my above observations. 3. In the result, the appeals is partly allowed with consequential benefit, if any, to the appellants." 2. We find that the appellate authority h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X