1998 (4) TMI 293

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Appellant. Shri S. Nunthuk, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : K. Sankararaman, Member (T)]. Shri Rohan Shah, learned Counsel for the appellant states that the issue involved in this appeal stands covered by a Tribunal decision in appellant s own case as reported in 1995 (75) E.L.T. 65. He adds that though the department has challenged this decision before the Supreme Court and t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been rejected by the Tribunal in the decision cited above. 2. Replying to the submissions made by the learned DR, Shri S. Nunthuk while conceding that the decision cited by the learned Counsel is against the department, stated that the department has challenged the said decision before the Supreme Court. 3. We have considered the submissions of both sides. We have perused the Tribunal order. T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X