1998 (8) TMI 278

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... These are two appeals filed by M/s. Nestle India Ltd. being aggrieved by two separate orders both dated 9-6-1992 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Chandigarh. In both the cases, the appeals had been rejected on the ground of un-due enrichment. In both the cases, the orders were passed exparte. 2. The appellants have submitted that in both the cases the date of hearing was fixe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Court in the case of Mafatlal Industries Ltd. - 1997 (89) E.L.T. 247 (S.C.). The orders were passed in the absence of the appellants. 5. Taking the relevant facts and consideration into account, we remand both the matters to the jurisdictional Commissioner of Central Excise, who should pass an speaking appealable order as per law after affording an opportunity to the appellants to present their .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X