9911796707
TMI Blog1999 (1) TMI 150X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... DR, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondents. [Order]. - This is a Revenue appeal arising from Order-in-Appeal No. 44/92-C.E., dated 19-12-1992. The Commissioner set aside the order-in-original passed by the Assistant Commissioner holding that Modvat credit of Rs. 2,44,318.00 (B.E.D.) and Rs. 12,206.00 (S.E.D.) in respect of credit taken on inputs which were in stock and contained in the f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t credit. The Commissioner has noted that the issue was covered by the Tribunal judgment in the case of Wipro Information Technology as reported in 1988 (33) E.L.T. 172; Sri Sarvaraya Sugar (Bottling Unit) Ltd. as reported in 1992 (59) E.L.T. 125 (Tribunal) = 1991 (37) ECR 617; V.B.C. Industries Ltd. as reported in 1992 (42) ECR 479. 2. In this appeal, Revenue submits that it would be an abb ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t liable to be disallowed if subsequently finished goods were exempted from duty as has been held in C.C.E. v. Wipro Information Technology. Even in the case of C.C.E. v. V.B.C. Industries, the Tribunal held that there is no provision under Modvat Rules for reversal of credit attributable to inputs laying in stock at the time of withdrawal provided the credit had been correctly availed and utilise ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
