1998 (6) TMI 326

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. In the appeal filed by the Revenue the issue involved is refund of duty paid twice under Rule 173L of Central Excise Rules. 2. Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, learned DR submitted that the respondents have removed the consignment of computer hardware supplied to the State Bank of India on payment of duty. These computers were brought back to the factory under .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the same goods which is not in dispute. 4. We have considered the submissions of both sides. No doubt, the correction of the documents is not covered by the facility provided under Rule 173L. The respondents should have followed the procedure either under Rule 173H or Rule 51A of the Central Excise Rules for bringing the duty paid goods into the factory. However, we observe that it has not bee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X