1999 (9) TMI 146

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lant. Shri Y.R. Kilania, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Vice President]. - The impugned order in the present appeal denies the abatement claims filed by the appellant herein for 9-1-1998 to 16-1-1998 for non-complying with the provisions of Rule 96ZO(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Findings of the adjudicating authority rejecting the said claims are that the appellants her .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 98. 3. As regards the information provided for the period i.e. 25-3-1998 to 31-3-1998. We observe from the relevant closure information that it was received in the office of the Central Excise only on 26-3-1998. Therefore the provisions of Rule 96ZO(2) have not been complied with as held by the adjudicating authority. At this stage learned Advocate Shri R. Santhanam prays for an appropriate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X