1999 (8) TMI 157

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The demand in the present case has been raised and confirmed on a product which the Revenue describes as Mill neps under CET sub-heading 56.01 and on yarn containing mill neps which the Department holds as classifiable under CET sub-heading 5506.29, which was cleared by the assessees on payment of duty under CET sub-hea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... demand has been set aside and the appeal be allowed. 3. Ld. JDR reiterates the findings of the authorities below and draws our attention to the relevant Tariff entries. 4. We have considered the submission of both the sides and perused carefully the orders relied upon by the appellants and agree with the above mentioned orders fully cover the issue in dispute in this case. Respectfull .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X