Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1999 (4) TMI 275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ue pertain to the admissibility of Modvat credit on Molybdenum wire. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that Modvat credit will be admissible to the respondents before us. For coming to this conclusion, he had relied on a number of decisions of the Tribunal on the issue. Being aggrieved by this order, the Revenue has filed these two appeals. Since the issue in both the appeals is the same, they were .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted that the ratio of these decisions is squarely applicable to the facts of the case of the assessees. The Commissioner (Appeals) after taking into consideration the case law cited by the assessees set aside the order of the Asst. Commissioner and allowed the appeal of the assessees. 3. Shri Y.R. Kilanyia, ld. JDR submits that the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Apar Limited [1993 (67) E.L.T. 364] .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cision of M/s. Apar Limited which was considered in the subsequent decision of the Tribunal and was stated to be bad law. He submits that the subsequent decision of the Tribunal clearly held that Molybdenum wire is neither tool nor appliance but is an input and not covered by the excluded category of the inputs under Rule 57A. He submits that it is settled in law that the judgment delivered later .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d the submissions of both sides. The first issue for determination before me is whether the proceedings in the instant case shall be covered by the decision in the case of Apar Limited or subsequent decisions in the case of M/s. Jai Electric Limited [1995 (76) E.L.T. 92], in the case of Kalpana Lamp and Components Limited [1997 (91) E.L.T. 162] and in the case of M/s. ECE Industries Limited report .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates