Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1999 (9) TMI 205

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. When this application seeking stay came up for hearing, it appeared that the issue being settled, the main appeal itself could be taken up for disposal. Both sides agreeing, this was done, after granting waiver of pre-deposit of penalty of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only). 2. The appellants imported Used Diesel En .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s for expenses such as demurrage, he determined the quantum of fine which is about 292% of the value of the goods. 5. Shri Doiphode submits that a number of consignment of such engines is being imported regularly. He has placed on record a chart where 9 adjudication orders dating between June, 1998 to June, 1999 are cited where the range of fines imposed is between 80% to 135%. He also has place .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... were cited before the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) which he had failed to discuss in his order. In our Order Nos. 3680-3681/98/WZB/C-I, dated 21-9-1998 [1999 (107) E.L.T. 476 (T)] (M/s. Pioneer International), we had opined that although the various factors prescribed in Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, would keep changing from time to time and therefore, it would be inappropriate to adopt a p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Additional Commissioner had given the working of the margin of profit. We have no observation thereupon except to state that where the Customs were capable of adopting this margin in all cases, they had not done so in earlier cases. Subsequent to the present case also the department has contented themselves imposing much less quantum of fine. Therefore there was no sanctity in the customs imposin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e from Rs. 30,000/- to Rs. 10,000/-. 10. On the aspect of penalty no significant argument was advanced except to state that in all the previous orders, the ranges was about 10%. We find this is to be so, but observe that in the last cited case of import at Jaipur, the penalty was about 40%. On this ground we refix the quantum of penalty at Rs. 2 lakhs (Rupees two lakhs only). 11. The appeal is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates