TMI Blog1999 (10) TMI 163X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... R, for the Respondents. [Order]. - Modvat credit of Rs. 43,622.00 has been denied and a personal penalty of Rs. 1500.00 has been imposed by the Assistant Commissioner on the ground that the applicants/appellants availed the Modvat credit on the basis of the invoices which were not properly pre-authenticated and which carried the rubber-stamp as Duplicate Transporter's Copy instead of the same b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re-authenticating the invoices. 4. Shri J.M. Kenedy, learned JDR for the Revenue submits that it was the requirement of law to pre-print the entire words - "Duplicate for Transporter's Copy" - and not simply - " Transporter's copy". He also draws my attention to the Calcutta-II Commissionerate's Trade Notice No. 24/GL-18/CE/PRO/CAL-II/95, dated 22-2-1995 which prescribes the name and designa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|