1999 (3) TMI 286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eal in the present case was rejected on the ground that the appellant did not make a deposit of Rs. 20,000/- as ordered on its stay petition. Shri Sengupta explains that after the said stay order was passed, the appellant had filed a letter dated 16-7-1997 seeking reduction of the amount of pre-deposit in view of his financial difficulties. The appellant had also written again on the matter vide t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appeal has been rejected in the instant case for non-deposit of the amount ordered to be deposited in the stay application. From the appellant s letters dated 16-7-1997 and 19-7-1997, it is observed that he had sought variation of the terms of the stay order. This variation application has not been considered by the Commissioner (Appeals). The matter is, therefore, required to go back to him for f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X