Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1999 (8) TMI 254

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... paratus, tools etc. and they were used for processing and producing their final products and thus were an excluded item in terms of the explanation under Notification No. 217/86-C.E., dated 2-4-1986 as amended. 2. The appellants have prayed for decision on merits. They have relied upon the Tribunal s decision in the case of Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. C.C.E., Pune [1994 (70) E.L.T. 75 (Tribunal)]. 3. Today, the matter is listed for mention. As the appellants have prayed for decision on merits and there is nothing to indicate about the Larger Bench decision referred to earlier and as the facts are not disputed, we are proceeding to deal with the matter on merits after hearing Shri M.P. Singh, JDR. 4. Shri M.P. Singh, l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ocessing of the goods. The relevant extracts from the explanation are given below: Machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing of any goods or for bringing about any change in any substance in or in relation to the manufacture of the final products. There is no dispute that the gauges were in the nature of apparatus, tools or appliances. It is also admitted position that they were used for the production and processing of the final products. The final products manufactured by the appellants were precision items which had to conform to the given specifications. It was precisely for this purpose that the gauges in question were used. We consider that the equipment, apparatus, to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inal products . Therefore, what is excluded from the scope of Notification No. 217/86, is automatically covered by definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q. Viewed from this angle, we hold that the judgments in the context of Rule 57Q are directly applicable to the present case. Since it has been held in the above decisions that material handling equipment is used for processing goods in relation to the manufacture of the final products, such equipment are excluded from the scope and ambit of Notification 217/86. The items in dispute viz. tollies, bins and pallets are material handling equipment used for storing, stacking, handling and bringing together various materials, components used in the manufacture of motor vehicles of different t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates