1999 (8) TMI 278

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d and J.S. Agarwal, Advocates, for the Appellants. Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - The four stay applications have been taken up together as they arise out of the same order. The dispute in this case was that certain goods were clandestinely removed from the premises of M/s. Rajasthan Explosives Chemicals and were received by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . He submits therefore, that since Shri Ganesh Mathur had no opportunity whatsoever to defend his case pre-deposit of penalty imposed on him may be waived. 3. We find that the basic issue in these appeals is clandestine removal of goods by the manufacturer and receipt of these goods by another party. Since the principles of natural justice were violated specially in the case of Shri Ganesh Math .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X