1999 (12) TMI 283

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ts have sought for condonation of two months and 21 days. The reason given is that the appellants had engaged one Sri S.V. Subramanyam, advocate and the matter was handled by the company s Corporate office at Hyderabad. The company was in touch with the Consultant but he did not respond and he did not prepare the appeal in spite of several reminders. Therefore, they engaged the services of Sri Lal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r dated 28.12.1999 seeking adjournment of the case. 2. As sufficient opportunities have been given and the appellants have not taken due care to explain the delay, except to say that the matter had been entrusted to one advocate and later re-entrusted to the other, the details of entrusted date chart and affidavit have not been filed and therefore, the application for COD is rejected and the a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X