Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2000 (11) TMI 324

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hed to it has been levied with effect from the date of imposition of the provisional anti-dumping duty, i.e., 11th October, 1999 on Thermal Sensitive Paper (hereinafter referred to as TSP) exported from European Union and Japan. M/s. Mitsubishi HITEC Paper, a manufacturer of TSP in European Union has been directed to pay anti-dumping duty at the rate of Rs. 1.61 per sq. metre and in respect of other exporters from the European Union at the rate of Rs. 1.84 per sq. metre. Exports from Japan were subjected to anti-dumping duty at the rate of Rs. 1.62 per sq. metre. 2. The above notification is questioned by M/s. Jujo Thermal Ltd. of Finland, a manufacturer of TSP in Finland, by filing appeal No. C/373/2000-AD. M/s. All India Thermal Paper D .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng the Designated Authority suggested imposition of anti-dumping duty at a higher rate than that was fixed in relation to M/s. Mitsubishi HITEC Paper, in relation to the exports from all countries forming part of European Union. This was clearly wrong. According to learned counsel, when exports from Finland were sought to be made subject to payment of anti-dumping duty, fresh notice of the intention on the part of the Designated Authority to make liable the exports from Finland should have been issued to the manufacturers in Finland. This having not been done, the Final Finding arrived at by the Designated Authority and the consequent notification issued by the Central Government imposing anti-dumping duty on exports from Finland forming pa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... P) from Japan, Finland, Germany and European Union. Finland is a country forming part of the territory known as European Union. In other words, even though Finland was independently dealt with in the proceedings, it was a country forming part of European Union. Exporters from Finland did not cooperate in the proceedings. It was so, because there was no export of TSP from Finland to India during the period of investigation, namely, 1st April, 1998 to 31st December, 1998. Being a country falling within the territory of European Union against which also proceedings under the anti-dumping provisions were initiated, they were separately dealt with. This will not mean that they are not part of the territory falling within the European Union. One .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of exports forms that country or the potential of that country in dumping the goods should have been separately dealt with. If the imports from Finland account for less than 3% of the imports to India, then the Designated Authority should have terminated the investigation as against the goods imported from Finland. We do not find any merit in this contention. Even though Finland is a country by itself, it forms part of the territory known as European Union. When that territory is dealt with separately, the country forming part of that territory is also taken within its ambit. Viewed in that light, we hold that there is no merit in the contention raised by the learned counsel representing the appellants in the two appeals that the proceedin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ection 9A(6) authorised the Central Govt. to make rules for the purpose of imposing anti-dumping duty. The Rules so framed authorise the Designated Authority to recommend the anti-dumping duty on the basis of which Central Govt. is to issue notification. These Rules do not contemplate a second hearing to the foreign manufacturer or exporter. As per the Rules, the Designated Authority is invested with the power to identify the article liable for anti-dumping duty and to submit its finding on the quantum of anti-dumping duty which would be adequate to remove the injury to domestic industry. It was this suggestion made by the Designated Authority that was to be the basis for the final notification to be issued by the Central Govt. So, as per t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates