9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (1) TMI 362X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Appellant. Shri Y. R. Kilania, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order]. The applicants filed these applications for waiver of pre-deposit of the following penalty amounts imposed under Section 112 (a) : 1. Shyam Sunder - Rs. 10 lakh 2. Raj Kumar - Rs. 1 lakh 3. Lal Chand Mani Lal - Rs. 1 lakh. 2. Ld. Counsel, appearing on behalf of the applicants, submit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... E.L.T. 45 (T) - 1999 (32) R.L.T. 183 - Robin Agarwal v. C.C. (Prev.), West Bengal, Calcutta. 2. 1999 (34) RLT 555 - Sridharan Diamond v. C.C. (Airport), Calcutta. 3. 1999 (34) RLT 896 - Navneet Kumar v. C.C., Calcutta. 3. He, further, submits that Shyam Sunder Fatehpuria on 3-3-1997 and 4-3-1997 made a statement under Sec. 108 of Customs Act before the Revenue officer in respect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s that on investigation, out of seven, six persons denied the sale of the gold. In these circumstances, he submits that the plea taken by the applicant that the gold was lawfully purchased from Shri Lal Chand Mani Lal Soni, is after thought. He, therefore, prays that the applications be dismissed. 5. Heard both sides. 6. In this case, the gold worth Rs. 8,38,800/- was recovered from Sh. Shyam ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
