2000 (3) TMI 514

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... harma, Member (T)]. We have heard Shri K.S. Chauhan, ld. Counsel on the Miscellaneous Application for restoration of the Appeal which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 24-11-1999 on the ground that the notice issued to the appellant was received back with a postal remark that the Factory is closed . Ld. Counsel submits that notice is required to be sent to the Advocate of the appellant a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s of the Tribunal show that a copy of the notice was also sent to the Counsel. 3. We have heard the rival submissions. We find that notice sent to the appellant was received back with a postal remark factory closed . If the factory was closed, it was incumbent on the appellant to intimate the change of address for correspondence to the postal authorities as well as to the Tribunal. We note that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X