2000 (10) TMI 388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - On the submission made by the advocate for the appellant that, he only wishes to raise the ground relating to the quantum of redemption fine and no other aspect of the matter, with the consent of the departmental representative, the appeal has been taken up for disposal. 2. In the impugned order, the Commissioner has .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he goods. The loss caused to the appellant as a result of the capital being tied up and the detention charge incurred is around Rs. 1.50 lacs and the goods in question imported under the provisions of the Open General Licence. 4. The departmental representative points out that the redemption fine imposed is only about 30% of the value and does not call for any further reduction. 5. Tak .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X