9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (11) TMI 449X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Sharma, Member (T)]. This is an application filed by the Commissioner of Customs New Delhi stating that some errors have crept in the Tribunal s final order No. A/828/99, dated 11-8-1999. 2. Arguing the case for Revenue Sh. Rajeev Tandon, ld. SDR, submits that this Tribunal by its Order No. A/828/99-NB, dated 11-8-1999 [2000 (117) E.L.T. 258 (Tribunal)] allowed the appeal of M/s. M.V.T. I ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ubsequent period. We, therefore, prays that ROM may be rejected. 4. We have heard rival submissions and perused the final order. We note that the decision of the Apex Court now cited by Revenue was not cited and relied upon at the time of arguing the appeal. In these circumstances we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record. 5. The Revenue has cited another case decided by this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
