2000 (11) TMI 455

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... icants filed this application for waiver of duty of Rs. 3,28,150/- and penalty of Rs. 80,000/-. 2. The Commissioner (Appeals), in the impugned order, dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants on the ground that they had not complied with the directions given in the Stay Order. Ld. Counsel, appearing on behalf of the applicants, submits that against the adjudication order, the applicants fil .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been served upon the applicants. The case was adjourned twice on the request of the D.R. for verifying this fact. Ld. D.R. also submits that they had written to the Commissioner, but no reply has bean received by him. In view of this, prima facie, the balance of convenience is in favour of the applicants. Therefore, the deposit of duty and penalty is waived for hearing of the appeals. Adjourned t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X