9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (12) TMI 282X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. The applicant filed this application under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for rectification of mistake in the Stay Order No. 160/2000-B dated 17th August, 2000. 2. The contention of the applicant is that the case of the applicant before the lower authorities was that they were clearing goods with the House marks of M/s. Fujitsu India Tele ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t maintainable. His submission is that under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure ) Rules, 1982, the Tribunal can pass orders or give directions as may be necessary in relation to pass the order or to prevent abuse of his process to secure the ends of justice. He submits that the present application does not fulfil the conditions laid down under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. He, therefo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
