9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (8) TMI 549X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appeals were taken up together. Appeal Nos. E/1698-99/2000 arises out of one impugned order where under five adjudication orders were disposed of. Appeal No. E/1846/2000 arises out of a different impugned order. But since the issue in all the three appeals is the same, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The issue is whether defective goods returned for remaki ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is Tribunal first in the case of C.C.E., Meerut v. Steel Manufacturing Co. reported in 2000 (119) E.L.T. 290 (Tri. - LB)=2000 (39) RLT 197 held that the defective goods returned to the manufacturers for remaking are inputs for purpose of Modvat. He submits further that again in the case of C.C.E., Meerut v. Bhushan Steel Strips Ltd. reported in 2000 (119) E.L.T. 293 (Tri. - LB) = 2000 (39) RLT 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the Larger Bench decisions and particular decision on their own product covers their product clearly and therefore, prays that the appeals may be allowed. 4. Shri R. Babu, ld. DR reiterates the findings of the authorities below. 5. I have heard the submissions of the ld. Counsel and the DR. I find that the product in particular is covered by decision of the Tribunal. I also note that three ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
