TMI Blog2001 (4) TMI 264X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (J)]. Vide the impugned order against the adjudication order passed by the Assistant Commissioner who rejected the importers claim of assessment of disputed goods i.e. Demag Crane under Customs Tariff Heading 98.01 under project import and confirmed a duty demand of approximately Rs. 1.63 crores by holding that the goods fall for classification under Heading 8426.41 of the Schedule to the C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . 759. The above decision was set aside by the Apex Court and remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision and the Larger Bench s decision of the Tribunal in the same case is reported in 2000 (122) E.L.T. 315. Having regard to the above, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order except to add that the Assistant Collector whom the matter already stands remanded shall decide the matter ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|