9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (5) TMI 271X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... M.H. Patil, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K. Sreedharan, President]. This appeal, at the instance of the Revenue is against the order of the adjudicating authority dated 10-4-1992. That order happened to be passed pursuant to a show cause notice dated 15-9-1989 in relation to the transaction covering the period 1-9-1985 to 28-2-1987. The respondent herein challenged ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 95. The appeal was pursuant to the order of review passed by the Board on 15-11-1994. When this appeal came up for final hearing Learned Counsel representing the respondents raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal. According to the Counsel the order of the adjudicating authority dated 10-4-1992 should have been reviewed by the Board within one year therefrom as contemplated ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ds as follows : 12. The High Court s order dated 20th June, 1984 required the Revenue not to communicate to the assessee the said assessment order. It imposed no restriction on the activities of the Revenue. That this is so is borne out by the terms of the subsequent order of the High Court dated 18th July, 1991 in which the Revenue was directed to supply copies of the said assessment order to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /84 the High Court gave an option to file appeal against the order passed by the adjudicating authority within two months from the date of the judgment namely 21st July, 1994. The High Court thus gave right to the Revenue to challenge the order passed by the adjudicating authority within two months from 21-7-1994. The Revenue did not get that period extended by the High Court, for filing this appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
