2000 (9) TMI 592

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hattopadhyay, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.N. Busi, Member (T)]. Arguing on both these appeals, Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, ld. Consultant for the appellant, submits that the Annual Capacity of Production for the year 1997-98 was determined at 22,400 M.T. (13066.66 M.T. during September, 1997 and March, 1998 on prorata basis) in respect of Induction Furnace and 16,408.35 M.T. (95 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lity of raw materials, break down in plant and market position. In fact these were not the grounds under which redetermination was sought. The ld. Consultant, therefore, submits that there was total lack of application of mind on the part of the Commissioner in passing the orders impugned. He prays for remand of these cases to the Commissioner for redetermination of the matter. 2. Shri A.K. Chat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X