9911796707
TMI Blog1971 (9) TMI 158X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eference made to it under section 21(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 (6 of 1941). That was a reference made by the Board of Revenue, West Bengal, in pursuance of the directions given by the High Court. After stating a case, the Board referred three questions to the High Court at the instance of the assessee- company. The assessee informed the High Court that it did not want any answer to the third question. The High Court answered questions Nos. (i) and (ii) in favour of the assessee-company. Aggrieved by that order the Board of Revenue has come up in appeal to this court. The material facts are these: Messrs Phelps & Co. (Private) Ltd., the assessee is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, having its ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o refer certain questions of law to the High Court. The Board refused to refer these questions. Dissatisfied by the order of the Board, the dealer moved the High Court of Calcutta under section 21(2) of the Act for direction to the Board to state a case. The High Court accepted that petition and directed the Board to state a case and submit the questions that the assessee-company wanted it to submit to the High Court. The Board accordingly stated a case and submitted the following three questions: "(i) Whether 'gloves' put on by the purchasing companies' workmen engaged in hot jobs or in handling corrosive substances in the course of manufacture can be stated to have been used in the manufacture of goods for sale as understood by the provi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o find out what exactly is the meaning of the expression "for use by him in the manufacture of goods for sale". Identical words are used in section 8(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. This court was called upon to find out the scope of that expression in J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur [1965] 16 S.T.C. 563 (S.C.); [1965] 1 S.C.R. 900. Dealing with that expression this court observed: "The expression 'in the manufacture of goods' should normally encompass the entire process carried on by the dealer of converting raw materials into finished goods. Where any particular process is so integrally connected with the ultimate production of goods that but for that process, manufacture or processing of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
