2002 (2) TMI 689

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... has been filed against the decision of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Mumbai-III made in Order-in-Appeal No. YPP/47/M-111/2001, dated 29-3-2001. 2. The Appellant is the manufacturer of Biscuits falling under Chapter sub-heading No. 1905.11 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The preventive staff of the department observed that on scrutiny of actual stock of input certain quantitie .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arketing Co. and Nathani, Director under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appeal was filed before Commissioner (Appeals) by the said Nathani, and the appellate authority directed by his order dated 31-1-2001, pre-deposit 1 lakh within 15 days and report compliance of the same within 20 days from the receipt of his order. By his letter dated 24-2-2001 appellant desired modification of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... se of Union of India v. Jesus Sales Corporation, 1996 (83) E.L.T. 486 (S.C.). Two Member Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Entek IRD International Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, 2000 (115) E.L.T. 515 (T) have followed the above decision of the Gujarat High Court set aside the such type of order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and remanded the same appeal after referring to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X