Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2001 (5) TMI 762

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i. V. K. Gupta, Managing Director Rs. 7,50,000/- penalty 2. Shri R. Swaminathan, learned Consultant submitted that the Appellant company manufactures hologram and holographic films which is a laminated product; that they were classifying the impugned products under Heading 49.01 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act as a product of printing industry, whereas the Commissioner has classified it under sub-Heading 39.19 of the Tariff as self-adhesive films. He referred to Note 2 to Section VII of the Tariff, which provides that except for the goods of Heading No. 39.18 or 39.19, plastics, rubber, and article thereof, printed with motifs, character or pictorial representations, which are not merely incidental to the pri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e case of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) v. Afrique Trade Links Ltd. - 2001 (129) E.L.T. 539 (Tri); that the Adjudicating Authority did not deal with the expert opinion placed by them on record nor did he considered the various samples of the self-adhesive films placed before him; that he has described the expert opinion by merely observing that the word lamination has been used in the said report in common literary parlance to describe the goods and not in strict legal and technical terms. The learned Consultant, finally, submitted that the Adjudicating Authority had not supported his finding with any technical material/literature and as such, prima facie their claim for classification under Chapter 49 cannot said to be incorrect. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ips of plastics. 4. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. We find substance in the submissions of the learned SDR that the product manufactured by them does not cease to be prima facie self-adhesive film merely because the one side of the same is laminated. As such, the Appellants have not made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of entire amount of duty. No financial hardship has also been pleaded before us. We, therefore, direct the Applicant s Company to deposit Rs. 36 lakhs within 8 weeks from today and on complying with this direction, there shall be waiver of pre-deposit of remaining amount and entire amount of penalty and the recovery of the same will be stayed during the pendency of the Appeal. The mat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates