9911796707
TMI Blog1995 (5) TMI 213X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... S.) R. THAMARAJAKSHI S. Ganesh, Ms. S. Sethna and Ms. Meera Singh for the Petitioner. ORDER Mr. Justice V. Balakrishna Eradi, President - This revision petition has been filed by Tata Timken Ltd. challenging the legality of the orders passed by the State Commission, Madras and the District Forum, Madras directing the revision petitioner company to allot a specified number of partly con ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on to the complainant and also pay a sum of Rs. 1,000 by way of compensation. The company failed to appear before the District Forum on the date on which the case was taken up for considera-tion and hence the District Forum passed an ex parte order directing the company to pay a sum of Rs. 1,000 by way of compensation to the complainant together with an amount of Rs. 300 by way of cost. It did not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e revision peti- tioner is that the complainant is not a consumer at all and the order passed by the District Forum, Madras as well as the order passed by the State Commission in granting reliefs to her be set aside and the complaint before the District Forum, Madras be dismissed. 5. In the light of the order passed by us today in Tata Timken Ltd. v. Consumer Protection Council [Revision Petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
