1994 (1) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Annoussamy, President - This is an appeal by the complainant. She is a holder of shares from the company of the opposite party/respondent No. 1 herein. She applied for preferential right shares which were announced by the opposite party No. 1. Even though she has sent the applications in the proper form, the shares were not issued to her. After making repeated requests she was driven to approach .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the shares declared being allotted by the opposite party before the District Forum. Only after the appeal was preferred the allotment took place. The opposite party No. 1 would explain away the delay in stating that they have not noticed the change of address of the complainant and that they have sent her shares to her at old address and that the same were returned. 3. In this case, there ar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... which she could have obtained as a matter of routine, she had to approach the District Forum and then the State Commission, that in the process she had incurred much expenditure apart from having some amount of anxiety till the shares reached her. We, therefore, consider that there is some room for compensation, which in this case we shall limit to a token amount in view of the fairness of the opp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X