9911796707
TMI Blog2002 (5) TMI 653X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mondal, Consultant with H.R. Shetty, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Shaikh, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - The above appeal arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Customs who has suspended the CHA licence of the appellants under Regulation 21(2) of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984. 2. The appellants are a sole proprie ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 30-10-2000 [2001 (130) E.L.T. 572]. Thereafter, second suspension order No. 24/2000, dated 6-10-2000 was issued wherein, apart from the two grounds detailed above in respect of order No. 18/2000, the 3rd ground was stated viz. that Shri C.R. Shukla was one of the accused in the case involving on seizure of about 589 kgs of hashish. This suspension order was set aside by the Tribunal by order date ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... esult of the remand order dated 11-6-2001 the present adjudication order has come to be passed on the same grounds viz. (a) operation under CHA licence of some other person (b) diversion of duty free goods to the open market, contrary to the DEEC scheme and (c) involvement of Shri C.R. Shukla in Narcotics' case. 3. It is brought to our notice by Shri K.M. Mondal appearing for the appellan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fore, submits that none of the grounds cited for suspension in the present impugned order are available to the department and therefore, prays that the order of suspension may be set aside and that the appellants may be permitted to function as CHA, pending orders in regular proceedings already initiated against the appellants. 4. The prayer is opposed by ld. D.R. Shri Shaikh who reiterates ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
