2002 (7) TMI 540

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - Heard. 2.  This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned order dated 12-12-2001 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he has dismissed the appeal of the appellants preferred against the letter dated 29-8-2001 issued on behalf of the Deputy Commissioner. 3. The appeal, in our view, on the face of it .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nveyed the order. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) has rightly observed that it is no order in the eye of law and the appellants should approach the competent authority for getting the legal order. The learned counsel has not been able to point out any legal fault in this order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) has observed that the order appealed against before him was n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X