TMI Blog2003 (7) TMI 360X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. The above application filed by the appellant is to raise additional grounds inasmuch as they have stated that - (1) the Collector has gravely erred in ignoring the fact that the process of doubling/multifolding of single yarn was not a process of manufacture till the said process was introduced as a process of manufacture w.e.f. 16-3-19 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ase of Hindustan Lever Ltd v. Collector - 2001 (138) E.L.T. 31 ( P H ). Likewise, he has prayed for applying the ratio as rendered in the case of Magic Products v. Commr. - 2001 (130) E.L.T. 103 (Tri.-Chennai), wherein it has been held that the contention that even parts of oven are eligible for benefit of Notification No. 139/90-Cus. had not been raised before the lower authorities and was not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... facture was held to be a question of law and it was allowed to be raised. He submits that all the judgments cited by DR pertained to facts which were not raised before the lower authorities and the Tribunal and the Court did not allow such facts to be raised. He submits that it is a well settled proposition and law that question of facts for the first time cannot be raised at appellate stage, whil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|