2003 (3) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the appellants in spite of service of notice as per acknowledgement on record. In these circumstances, the appeal is being taken for hearing. 2. Appellants filed this appeal against the order dated 20-6-2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, whereby the appeal filed by the appellants was d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ble High Court and, thereafter the petition was dismissed with costs. 5. Revenue was regularly pursuing the appellants to deposit the outstanding dues and the Assistant Commissioner wrote to the appellants on 26-3-2002 that as the appellants had not paid the dues, the department is proceeding ahead with the attachment of the property. Against this letter of the Assistant Commissioner, appellant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X