9911796707
TMI Blog2002 (4) TMI 863X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent No. 1, Ms. Davawala for respondent No. 2 waive service of rule. With the consent of learned advocates for the parties matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. The present petition is filed by the petitioner against the order dated 26-9-2000 passed by the Regional Director, Western Region, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, Bombay, Govt. of India, the respondent No. 2 herein. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the respondent No. 2 has only recorded the submissions of the rival sides and no reasons, whatsoever, are recorded saying as to how and in what manner he is accepting the submissions of either party for passing the order under section 22(1)( b ) of the Act. In the matter of exercise of powers under section 22 of the Act, I am of the view that since final order passed under section 22 of the Act re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 26-9-2000 is quashed and set aside only on the ground that the same does not record reasons for passing final order with further clarification that it will be open to the respondent No. 1 to move the respondent No. 2 for reconsidering the matter afresh after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and it will also be open for respondent No. 2 to record reasons for passing the order and the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
