2003 (1) TMI 594

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Appellant. Shri Arun Chopra, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T). - Each of the appellant before us imported consignments of goods stated to be synthetic rags. Examination of each of the consignments showed that it was not composed of entirely synthetic rags but was found to contain either serviceable garments or garments cut in two pieces. On this bei .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nts says that the appeals are limited to the quantum of redemption fine. He points out that confiscation under clause (d) of Section 111 of the Act cannot be sustained, since import licences which had been produced for the goods have been accepted and debited. He contends that the importers have in fact paid more duty than they ought to have, since in order to ensure speedy clearance, they paid th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X