2003 (12) TMI 388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r (J)]. On matter being called, nobody appeared on behalf of the applicant/appellant-company in spite of today s notice of hearing having been sent to them as also to their Official Liquidator. We also note from the records that on the last occasion, their Advocate was present, who brought to our notice that an Official Liquidator had been appointed and a Notice to that effect was required t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ess. The Revenue s contention is that it is the intrinsic cost of the landed raw materials, which is required to be taken into account for the purposes of arriving at the assessable and by not including loss element, the assessable value of the product has gone down. On the other hand, the applicant/appellant-company has contended that apart from manufacturing the Steel Ingots out of the raw mater .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s no question of availing any option between the two Rules i.e. Rules 6(b)(i) and 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules. 4. Rule 6(b)(ii) can be resorted to only if the provisions of Rule 6(b)(i) are not applicable in a given case. In the present case, we find that the applicants/appellants have contended that they are manufacturing identical goods and are selling the same in the mark .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X