2003 (8) TMI 440

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Shri A.S. Bedi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. Heard both sides. 2. Applicants filed these applications for waiver of duty and penalty. Applicants submitted that the impugned order is passed in violation to the principles of natural justice. The show cause notice dated 3-7-2002 was affixed on the factory premises on 4-7-2002. This fact is admitted i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4. In this case the contention of the applicants is that the impugned order is passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. The traders on whom the penalties were imposed, specifically asked for relied upon documents which were not supplied to the applicants. This fact is not disputed by the Revenue. 5. Further, we find that the show cause notice dated 3-7-2002 and the same affixe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X