Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2004 (1) TMI 582

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e appellants manufacture Motor vehicle parts and avail of Modvat credit of the duty paid on inputs; that the Central Excise Officers visited their unit on 4-12-93 and found that RG 1 register was written up to 30-11-93, finished goods valued at Rs. 80,234.22 were found in excess of the stock entered in RG I and the goods valued at Rs. 4,87,801/- removed under GP I Nos. 838 to 845 from 1-12-93 to 3-12-93 was not recorded in RG I register. He submitted that production for 1-12-93 to 3-12-93 was recorded in production slips which were resumed by the Central Excise officers; that taking into account the production recorded in production slips and clearances made by them, there was neither any excess nor any shortage; that the Joint Commissione .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... otification No. 6/97-C.E. (N.T.) dated 1-3-97 whereas the inputs were sent by them in 1993. He relied upon the decision in the case of Asia Brown Boveri Ltd. v. CCE, Calcutta-I, [2001 (137) E.L.T. 384 (T) = 2000 (41) RLT 325 (CEGAT)] wherein has been held that there is condition in Rule 57F(3) at the relevant time providing for return of inputs within 60 days and it cannot, therefore, be alleged that the appellants had contravened the provisions of Rule 57F so as to deny them the benefit of Modvat credit. The Circulars and Trade Notices are issued for the conveniences of the Administration and cannot be said to have formed the condition in the provisions of the relevant Rules. Reliance has also been placed on the decision in the case of U .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ulter; that it has been held by the Appellate Tribunal in the case of CCE, Jaipur v. Mittal Laminates (P) Ltd. - 1999 (105) E.L.T. 408 (Tri.) that once the goods have reached the stage of fully finished, they are required to be recorded in the prescribed records. Since they were not recorded in the prescribed records, therefore a demand or otherwise for clandestine removal is not required to be proved. In the circumstances, I hold that the goods were liable to confiscation and should have been confiscated. Regarding non-receipt of the inputs after being processed by the job worker within 60 days, the learned Senior Departmental Representative submitted that under Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules at the material time, a manufacturer w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re is no reason why the entries cannot be made on daily basis in the RG-I register which is a statutory requirement under Rule 53 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Accordingly the excisable goods which were found not entered in the statutory records are liable to confiscation both under Rules 173Q and 226 of the Central Excise Rules. It has been held by the Supreme Court in the case of Junjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar v. Union of India [1999 (112) E.L.T. 772 (S.C.)] that when we examine Rule 173Q, it does appear to us that apart from the offending goods which are liable to confiscation the person concerned with that shall be liable to penalty up to the amount specified in the Rule. It is difficult to accept the argument of the appellant that le .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he learned Senior Departmental Representative in this regard has referred to Circular No. 8/93-CX 8 dated 15-7-93 wherein it has been provided that the earlier instructions on the issue of non-receipt of goods within the stipulated period of 60 days is reiterated and should be followed scrupulously and in case the job worker fails to return the goods within the period of 60 days and does not seek any extension of time, action should be initiated under Rules 57-I and 173Q so as to safeguard the revenue. However, in the present matter, the appellants have contended that the entire inputs have been received back by them. The Revenue has not controverted this submissions made by the appellants. In view of this fact, the duty demand on the input .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates