2005 (4) TMI 365

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r]. Heard both sides. Shri K. Kumar, learned Advocate appearing with Shri Manjit Singh Gupta, Consultant stated that no charges have been established against the appellant justifying penalty on him. He also stated that since the appellant had no knowledge of the contraband goods being carried in his truck, the truck should not be confiscated. He also cited the following decisions in support .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y is justified in confiscating the truck and imposing a penalty on the appellant. However, considering the fact that the truck is lying in the Department s custody for a very long time causing deterioration in the value of the truck, I reduce the redemption fine to Rs. 50,000/- and the penalty on the appellant is also reduced to Rs. 20,000/- to meet the ends of justice. The appeal is otherwise rej .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X