2004 (11) TMI 456

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of paper and paperboard classifiable under chapter 48 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. In their classification list effective from 1-3-94, the appellant claimed the benefit of Notification No. 1/93. The said classification list was approved by the proper officer. There after, the appellant filed anoth .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... imed. Revenue challenged the above order before the Commissioner (Appeals), who reversed the same and allowed the Revenue appeal. Hence the present appeal. 3. We have heard the Shri A.K. Saxena, ld. JDR appearing for the Revenue and Shri Hardik Modh, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant. 4. For better appreciation paragraph 2(C.C) of the notification is reproduced below. 2. The exemptio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iling the benefit of Notification No. 1/93, during the relevant period when they made their claim under exemption Notification No. 23/94, the benefit cannot be denied to them. Both the Notification was issued under section 5(A) of the Central Excise Act and the assessee was having an option to avail any of them unless there is a condition debarring them from availing the exemption. Entire purpose .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X