2005 (4) TMI 468

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri Ajay Saxena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. The issue involved in all the four stay petitions is identical, the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Honey and classified the same under heading 3003.31. However, the revenue entertained a view inasmuch as the goods in question are being sold under the appellants brand name Charak , the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... against the said decisions, the Commissioner (Appeals) accepted the appellants stand that the product would be correctly classifiable under Chapter 4 in terms of the Tribunal s order, but accepted the said claim of the appellant w.e.f 1-2-2001, when a fresh declaration was filed by them. As regards, the previous period he upheld the view of the original adjudicating authority. 2.The appellants .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X