9911796707
TMI Blog2005 (10) TMI 363X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the Appellant. Shri P.K. Rai, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.K. Abichandani, President]. All these applications raise identical contentions which were already dealt with earlier in C/Stay/654/2005-Cus. in Appeal No. C/511/2005, decided on 20-9-2005. The authorized representative of the applicants in all these cases, Capt. Vinay Sud who is the Regional Manager of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng line could not be expected to verify the cargo physically and that the appellant was justified in relying upon the certificate, which was raised in the earlier stay application, has also no substance because as per the Public Notice 20/2004, dated 19-10-2004, shipping lines were advised not to accept scrap unless it was accompanied by a PSI certificate from a notified agency as per Appendix 28 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rs within eight weeks from today, the appeal(s) in respect of which such deposit is made, will be listed for final hearing in its due course. If the amount is not so deposited, the relevant appeal will stand dismissed. Compliance report be made by 19-12-2005. 4. If the amounts are deposited, all these appeals will be clubbed together and be heard with Appeal No. C/511/2005. (Dictated in open C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
