TMI Blog2006 (8) TMI 367X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Appellant. Ms. Ashima Bansal, S.D.R., for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides and perused the record. 2. There is a short levy demand of above Rs. 47 lakhs. Out of this, an amount of about Rs. 25.5 lakhs is arising from a dispute in regard to the valuation of captively consumed yarn. The yarn in question was used in the manufacture of hosiery items i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Sidhartha Tubes [2000 (115) E.L.T. 32 (S.C.)]. As against this, the submission of the learned Counsel for the applicant is that valuation and payment of duty were made in terms of the law at the time of removal of the yarn and thus, no short levy had taken place. It is also his submission that only a small portion of the yarn removed fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|