2006 (3) TMI 619

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. These applications filed by the department (appellant in Appeal No. E/947/2000 and respondent in Appeal No. 1523/1999) pray for clarification/modification of Final Order No. 1009 - 1011/2003, dated 25-11-2003 passed by this Bench, whereby, on all issues other than the one relating to Section 11AC penalty, the case was remanded to the adjudicating .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the period of limitation for an application of this kind is only six months and that these applications (filed on 24-3-2005) are hopelessly time-barred. Ld. Counsel also relies on the decision in Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. Whirlpool India Ltd. [2006 (72) R.L.T. 162 (CESTAT-Chennai)J, wherein a similar application filed by the department was dismissed as time-barred after notin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X