2007 (2) TMI 467

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ta, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.V. Sairam, Member (T)]. - These stay applications filed along with appeals challenge the order of Commissioner of Central Excise made on 29-8-2006. This matter had come up twice before this Tribunal, when the Tribunal had ordered de novo adjudication and remanded the matter to the Commissioner. When the matter came up, the learned Advocate for the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ls against Order No. v[36.02]15/off/38/98/2/1999 dated 5-3-1999, nor any interest, penalty, other charges etc. levied on these dues] . 2. It was argued that the department has been part and parcel of the process of issue of the said sanctioned scheme of the BIFR and the order dated 5-3-1999 referred to therein was passed by the learned Commissioner relating to the present order. 3. The learned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... udicating authority to whom the case is remanded for a fresh decision should be competent enough to know of his responsibilities and should follow the procedure required under the law for which no basic Do s and Dont s have to be laid down by the higher forum every time the case is remanded. The learned Commissioner should have dealt with the request of cross-examination by the appellant and have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X