2007 (3) TMI 456

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Appellant. Shri D.P. Mukhopadhyay, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - After hearing both the sides at length, I find that appellant deposited an amount of Rs. 50,000/- towards duty, at the time of the Central Excise officers visit in their factory and during investigation, inasmuch as Central Excise officers entertained a view that the appellant had cleared their final product clandesti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ame amount has been adjusted against the Government dues by the adjudicating authority". He accordingly modified the order of the lower authority. 2. As a result of above developments appellant filed a refund claim of Rs. 50,000/-, which was rejected by original adjudicating authority as also by Commissioner (Appeals). The matter travelled up to Tribunal, who vide their order dt. 19-3-2004 s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... adjudication as well as appellate proceedings. My attention has been drawn to the earlier orders passed by Commissioner (Appeals) whereas he is referring to the said deposit as duty amount. The same was set aside by Commissioner (Appeals) inasmuch as there were no findings of the original adjudicating authority on the issue of clandestine removal. 4. After having gone through the earlier adj .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X