2007 (5) TMI 510

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted against Order in Appeal No. AT/635/RGD/2005 dated 30-11-2005 and AT/25/RGD/2006 dated 31-1-2006 which set aside the Order in Original that imposed penalty on the respondent. 2. None appeared on behalf of the respondent nor there is any request for adjournment. Since the issue is squarely covered by the decision of the Larger Bench, the appeal is taken up for disposal. 3. Heard the learned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r Modvat credit. The said findings are : I have perused the case records and considered the arguments advanced in their written submission and at the time of personal hearing held on 19-10-2005. The demand has been confirmed on the ground that the appellants were not entitled to the credit on inputs used in the manufacture of goods on job-work basis. It has been held by the Larger Bench of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X